It's a popular argument used by the more hardcore SNSD fans, the means by which they dismiss any negative arguments (however factual) against SNSD: Should the person have gotten their info from an anti-fan site or forum, it absolutely is NOT to be believed.
"Anti-fans lie!"
"They probably made it up!"
"They're biased against SNSD so they probably just wrote the stuff that would make SNSD look bad and left out the positive stuff!"
Even people who purport to be neutral tend to lean towards this ideology. After all, persons with such a negative view of a particular person or group can't be trusted to keep their commentary from slanting or their facts straight...right?
Despite being common knowledge at this point, it's worth repeating: Not every anti is one because of something as simple (and petty) as jealousy. As a matter of fact, you couldn't even define such a person as an anti. It's not is if they oppose the person(s) they anti for any reason other than self-hatred and or envy.
If you ask a lot of SNSD antis why they feel the way they do, the answer generally has nothing to do with physical appearances or the idea that their favorite male idol might think they're cute.
What pushed these people to anti status?
Seeing and learning of SNSD's undesirable behavior and attitudes, as well as how they were marketed, despite being meant to represent a young generation of girls.
So basically we have people who are antis because of, well, facts. That is, things that can be backed up with actual evidence: Events, video, audio, photographs, quotes.
Now, if we have these people who have declared themselves to be antis based off of what cannot be denied, and what can actually be proven, how can you say that the information off which they based their decisions was made up BY the person(s) after the fact?
Everyone knows of at least one fangirl or fanboy who only wants to hear positive things about the artist or group they idolize, however SNSD fangirls and fanboys seem to have made deflection of negativity an <b>art form</b>.
Anytime there is a negative event or controversy, the pattern is always the same:
1.) Downplay it and accuse others of overreacting.
2.) Blame someone else, even if it's not their fault.
3.) Bring up someone else who is "worse", as if that excuses everything.
The key word for this type of behavior is denial. This defense mechanism acts to "protect" the person from something they are incapable of handling; they will deny and deny, regardless of the fact that what they are denying is the cold hard truth. So then, these patterns are themselves representative of people who cannot accept the truth for what it is, and need to shelter themselves from it by pretending that what they are seeing is NOT what they are seeing.
If such a person must employ defense mechanisms in order to protect themselves from the truth, it's quite possible they would rather buy into false, fan-made propaganda than accept anything that conflicts with their own view of reality.
"Taeyeon made a racist statement!" becomes "Taeyeon didn't actually say that, you're interpreting it wrong!"
"Tiffany was rude and inconsiderate!" becomes "Tiffany was raised in America, and that's how they act so it's not her fault!"
"SNSD had massive plastic surgery." becomes "SNSD members are natural beauties! People are making that up!"
And on and on and on.
What we have here is
When you consider this, it shouldn't make much sense to dismiss the anti-fan waving facts in the air in favor of the fangirl who can only address "positive" things, and reject "negative" truth.
And so, the next time you see someone question, or maybe you yourself question (because I know not everyone lurking here is an anti) the source if it hails from an anti-site, just ask yourself: Who has more to gain or lose in the face of yet another SNSD controversy? Who is more likely to investigate and research or play it down and deny the truth of it? And who is more likely to LIE to convince you that what happened is true or not true?
Really think about it.